United for Care, the largest organization advocating for the approval of Florida Constitutional Amendment 2 legalizing the medical use of marijuana in the state, categorically rejects the claims put forward by a newly-launched website and video financed by Drug Free Florida, a committee chaired by controversial former Reagan aide Carlton Turner.
“The website and video are both filled with half-truths, distortions and outright lies,” said Ben Pollara, Campaign Manager of United for Care. “Floridians deserve a debate based on the facts, not disingenuous scare tactics.”
Through the website and the video, which can be found at www.voteno2.org, the Drug Free Florida committee makes a series of dubious, misleading and often inaccurate claims.
CLAIM: In reference to the availability of medical marijuana, the website asserts “anyone who wants pot will get it.”
FACT: This is simply not true. In their decision placing Amendment 2 on the November ballot, the Florida Supreme Court affirmed that only patients with “debilitating” diseases and medical conditions would qualify for medical marijuana.
CLAIM: “Teens will be able to legally purchase pot without their parents’ consent.”
FACT: Wrong again. In order to purchase medical marijuana, you would need a doctor’s recommendation. Under Florida law, barring a few extenuating circumstances, physicians are not allowed to provide medical treatment to minors without parental or guardian consent, so this is a groundless concern.
CLAIM: Amendment 2 will lead to a “pill mill”-like scenario in Florida. “Pot docs” will “spring up next to restaurants, schools, churches and supermarkets.”
FACT: Look no further than the State of Florida to see that this claim is baseless. The State of Florida’s office of Economic and Demographic Research has already addressed this issue. They have said the physician examination requirement, the application process with the Department of Health, the regulatory structure that would be implemented by that same body and subsequent protective laws that may be passed by the legislature would make this scenario extremely unlikely. (See pages 10-11 of OEDR Financial Information Statement http://edr.state.fl.us/Content/constitutional-amendments/2014Ballot/UseofMarijuanaforCertainMedicalConditions/CompleteFinancialInformationStatement.pdf)
CLAIM: The website further contends that “felons-even drug dealers” would be able to qualify as caregivers in order to administer medical cannabis to severely ill patients.
FACT: This claim requires the reader to assume that the state will implement Amendment 2 in an irresponsible way. If the amendment is passed, the Florida Department of Health will be tasked with issuing detailed regulations regarding qualification requirements for caregivers. During that process United for Care will fight alongside any organization that, like us, is concerned about making sure nobody with a record of dealing drugs can become a qualified caregiver.
“When it comes to the credibility of anything that comes from Drug Free Florida, it’s best to consider the source,” Pollara concluded. “The organization is chaired by Carlton Turner, a former Reagan-era drug policy aide who had to abandon his position following his statements on marijuana leading to homosexuality. If his views were too extreme for the Reagan administration in 1986, how can we take anything he or his organization says seriously?”
Powered by over 10,000 volunteers, United for Care is the largest organization in Florida urging voters to vote "yes" on Amendment 2. United for care is a non-partisan campaign with an on-the-ground presence in 18 communities across the state including campaign offices in Miami, Tampa and Orlando.
As for law enforcement, I think most police officers in Florida are sensible and reasonable human beings with compassion and in this modern day and age understand full well that Cannabis is a medicine and should be treated as such. It’s going to be a lot safer being tested for purity/mold/etc and sold by legal dispensaries than some back alley dealer with questionable products from who knows where. Thank you for your vote of YES on #2 here in Florida, please do not let us down on November 4th! Sunshine Cannabis™
These uninformed Sheriffs should stick to enforcing the law and quit trying to shape it. That is a clear conflict of interest and should be investigated in my opinion.
(Cannabis = Medicine, Marijuana = an intoxicant, ,imo)
Having over thirty years in Law Enforcement spanning two states in Local, State and Federal levels. Please correct me if I am wrong here. We were only allowed to endorse or not endorse Politicians or Political agenda’s. We were not permitted to openly campaign in any way or fashion in these arenas. We were responsible to enforce laws as they were written and that’s it. If we in any way campaigned using a format such as this. We would find ourselves and or our labor unions in conflict and subject to disciplinary action. The use of out sourced re-numerations for these endeavors can be construed as corruption, in a way to facilitate an end result. Think about it, do you not arrest a political figure because you endorse him / her in their elections. The same would apply to legislation agendas, If you openly support it and campaign for it, do you over look the fact that at the time it is illegal. Or in the later, do you continue to arrest individuals for something that is now legal. This is why we had to stay out of the way. “The Law Is The Law” and not subject to a law officers personal feelings or beliefs. It is my opinion that the Sheriffs Association is out of bounds on this and may find themselves answering to the powers that be.